|
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
|
2
Less Than Satisfactory
74.00%
|
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
|
4
Good
87.00%
|
5
Excellent
100.00%
|
70.0 %Content
|
|
35.0 %
Based on your interview, describe some measured and unmeasured costs of workplace stress.
|
Based on your interview, description of some
measured and unmeasured costs of workplace stress is missing.
|
Based on your interview, description of some
measured and unmeasured costs of workplace stress is vague and
inconsistent.
|
Based on your interview, description of some
measured and unmeasured costs of workplace stress is present and
appropriate.
|
Based on your interview, description of some
measured and unmeasured costs of workplace stress is present, clear,
and makes some connection to research.
|
Based on your interview, description of some
measured and unmeasured costs of workplace stress is clear, concise,
and makes connections to current research.
|
35.0 %
Based on your interview, discuss more common individual actions recommended to reduce workplace stress.
|
Based on your interview, discussion of some
common individual actions recommended to reduce workplace stress is
missing.
|
Based on your interview, discussion of some
common individual actions recommended to reduce workplace stress is
vague and inconsistent.
|
Based on your interview, discussion of some
common individual actions recommended to reduce workplace stress is
present and inappropriate.
|
Based on your interview, discussion of some
common individual actions recommended to reduce workplace stress is
present, clear, and makes some connection to research.
|
Based on your interview, discussion of some
common individual actions recommended to reduce workplace stress is
clear, concise, and makes connections to current research.
|
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
|
|
7.0 %
Thesis Development and Purpose
|
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
|
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.
|
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
|
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and
forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective
of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
|
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive.
The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis
statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
|
8.0 %
Argument Logic and Construction
|
Statement of purpose is not justified by the
conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
|
Sufficient justification of claims is
lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in
the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
|
Argument is orderly, but may have a few
inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims.
Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
|
Argument shows logical progressions.
Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth
progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are
authoritative.
|
Clear and convincing argument that presents a
persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources
are authoritative.
|
5.0 %
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
|
Surface errors are pervasive enough that
they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or
sentence construction are used.
|
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors
distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register),
sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.
|
Some mechanical errors or typos are present,
but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence
structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
|
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors,
although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and
effective figures of speech are used.
|
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
|
10.0 %Format
|
|
5.0 %
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
|
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
|
Appropriate template is used, but some
elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is
apparent.
|
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
|
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
|
All format elements are correct.
|
5.0 %
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
|
Sources are not documented.
|
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or
incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
|
Sources are documented, as appropriate to
assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
|
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
|
Sources are completely and correctly
documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free
of error.
|
100 %
Total Weightage
|
|