To Prepare: Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).Review the Work Environment Assessment Template*.Reflect on the output of your Disc

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).
  • Review the Work Environment Assessment Template*.
  • Reflect on the output of your Discussion post regarding your evaluation of workplace civility and the feedback received from colleagues.
  • Select and review one or more of the following articles found in the Resources:

    • Clark, Olender, Cardoni, and Kenski (2011)
    • Clark (2018)
    • Clark (2015)
    • Griffin and Clark (2014)

*Template completed in the Week 7 discussion should not be submitted with this assignment.

The Assignment (3-6 pages total):

Part 1: Work Environment Assessment (1-2 pages)

  • Review the Work Environment Assessment Template you completed for this Module’s Discussion.
  • Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace.
  • Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed.
  • Explain what the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace.

Part 2: Reviewing the Literature (1-2 pages)

  • Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you selected.
  • Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.
  • Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.

Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams (1–2 pages)

  • Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
  • Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.

resources

Broome, M., & Marshall, E. S. (2021). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.

Chapter 5, “Collaborative Leadership Contexts: It Is All About Working Together (pp. 155–178)

Chapter 8, “Creating and Shaping the Organizational Environment and Culture to Support Practice Excellence” (pp. 237–272)

Chapter 7, “Building Cohesive and Effective Teams” (pp. 212–231)

Select at least ONE of the following:

  • Clark, C. M., Olender, L., Cardoni, C., Kenski, D. (2011). Fostering civility in nursing education and practiceLinks to an external site.. The Journal of Nursing Administration, 41(7/8), 324–330.
  • Clark, C. M. (2018). Combining cognitive rehearsal, simulation, and evidence-based scripting to address incivility. Nurse EducatorLinks to an external site..
  • Clark, C. M. (2015). Conversations to inspire and promote a more civil workplace. American Nurse Today, 10Links to an external site.(11), 18–23. Retrieved from https://www.americannursetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ant11-CE-Civility-1023.pdf
  • Griffin, M., & Clark, C. M. (2014). Revisiting cognitive rehearsal as an intervention against incivility and lateral violence in nursing: 10 years laterLinks to an external site.. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 45(12), 535–542.

Please create a PowerPoint of maximum of 12 slides. Please review the question I created regarding my toping. The PowerPoint should be focused on “In patients with opioid-related hospital stays, how d

Please create a PowerPoint of maximum of 12 slides. Please review the question I created regarding my toping. The PowerPoint should be focused on “In patients with opioid-related hospital stays, how does opioid-related spending compared to other hospital-stay visits, affects the hospital financially and interfere with patient’s outcome?” Please review rubric in regards to what needs to be addressed. Only “online students” rubric guidelines applies to the powerpoint. Any additional resources need to be scholarly and within the last 5 years of publication

Please create a PowerPoint of maximum of 12 slides. Please review the question I created regarding my toping. The PowerPoint should be focused on “In patients with opioid-related hospital stays, how d
NR449 Evidence-Based Practice RUA: Evidence-Based Practice Change Group Project Guidelines Purpose The Group Presentation is the final of the three assignments in this course. It builds upon and utilizes information gathered and reported in the first two assignments. The purpose of this assignment is two-fold: a) to provide a solution to a clinical problem using the EBP process, and b) to demonstrate presentation skills for a group of peers. Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes. CO 1: Examine the sources of knowledge that contribute to professional nursing practice. (PO 7) CO 2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs 4 and 8) CO 3: Identify ethical issues common to research involving human subjects. (PO 6) CO 4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and clinical significance related to evidence-based practice. (POs 4 and 8) CO 5: Recognize the role of research findings in evidence-based practice. (POs 7 and 8) Due date: Your faculty member will inform you when this assignment is due. The Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment. Total points possible: 240 points Preparing the assignment (Online Students Only) Follow these guidelines when completing this online assignment. Speak with your faculty member if you have questions. Presentations will give a brief overview of the topic, followed by examples of how the topic influences or assists the nursing profession. Each student will contribute two to three slides for the group presentation. The final presentation will consist of 10–12 PowerPoint slides and may include handouts, if applicable. Preparing the assignment (Campus Students Only) Follow these guidelines when completing this on-campus assignment. Speak with your faculty member if you have questions. Each group will have 15 minutes to present on their topic. Presentations will give a brief overview of the topic, followed by examples of how the topic influences or assists the nursing profession. Each student will have an opportunity to present (speak). Each student will contribute two to three slides for the group presentation. Students will be prepared to have 10–12 PowerPoint slides and may include handouts, if applicable. Include the following sections: ( Content ([All Students] 125 points/52%) Identification of problem and impact on nursing practice. Clearly describe the research process, including what went well, barriers encountered, and what is still needed. Correlates research findings to identified clinical issue. Summarizes validity of qualitative and quantitative evidence. Findings are clearly identified. Recommends practice change with measurable outcomes and addresses feasibility issues. Suggestions for implementation. Conclusion of content findings. Delivery (40 points/17%) (Online Students Only) Follows guidelines for a professional PowerPoint presentation. Speak directly with faculty for online Canvas submission process. Evidence of participation by all group members. (Campus Students Only) Follows guidelines for a professional PowerPoint presentation. Verbal delivery with good volume, pitch, and inflection for all group members. Physical delivery with professional dress, good posture, facial expression with eye contact, and enthusiasm is present for all group members. All group members effectively use notes and do not read from slides. Participation by all group members. Slide Presentation ([All Students] 60 points/25% distributed as shown) Title slide including group members Introductory slide with the clinical problem Additional slides illustrating key points Conclusion slide Reference slide in current APA format Effective balance of color, graphics, words, and space Slide limit: 10–12, inclusive of introduction and references ***Optional handouts may be included to provide information for the audience to keep. Peer Evaluation ([All Students] 15 points/6%) Completed peer evaluation with respectful and constructive feedback. Equal work: Did equal share of work. Teamwork: Took the initiative in helping get the group organized. Communication: Provided ideas for the development of the presentation. Team membership skills: Assisted group members. Time: Met all deadlines. For writing assistance, visit the Writing Center. Please note that your instructor may provide you with additional assessments in any form to determine that you fully understand the concepts learned in the review module. Grading Rubric Criteria are met when the student’s application of knowledge demonstrates achievement of the outcomes for this assignment. Assignment Section and Required Criteria (Points possible/% of total points available) Highest Level of Performance High Level of Performance Satisfactory Level of Performance Unsatisfactory Level of Performance Section not present in paper Content (125 points/52%) 125 points 110 points 100 points 50 points 0 points Required criteria Identification of problem and impact on nursing practice. Clearly describe the research process, including what went well, barriers encountered, and what is still needed. Correlates research findings to identified clinical issue. Summarizes validity of qualitative and quantitative evidence. Findings are clearly identified. Recommends practice change with measurable outcomes and addresses feasibility issues. Suggestions for implementation. Conclusion of content findings. Includes 8 requirements for section. Includes 7 requirements for section. Includes 6 requirements for section. Includes 5 or less requirements for section. No requirements for this section presented. Delivery (40 points/17%) 40 points 35 points 25 points 12 points 0 points Required criteria (Online Students Only) Follows guidelines for a professional PowerPoint presentation. Speak directly with faculty for online Canvas submission process. Evidence of participation by all group members. (Campus Students Only) Follows guidelines for a professional PowerPoint presentation. Verbal delivery with good volume, pitch, and inflection for all group members. Physical delivery with professional dress, good posture, facial expression with eye contact, and enthusiasm is present for all group members. All group members effectively use notes and do not read from slides. Participation by all group members. Includes 2 requirements for section. (online) Includes 5 requirements for section. (campus) N/A Includes 4 requirements for section. (campus) Includes 1 requirement for section. (online) Includes 3 requirements for section. (campus) N/A Includes 2 or less requirements for section. (campus) No requirements for this section presented. (online) No requirements for section presented. (campus) Assignment Section and Required Criteria (Points possible/% of total points available) Highest Level of Performance High Level of Performance Satisfactory Level of Performance Unsatisfactory Level of Performance Section not present in paper Slide Presentation (60 points/25%) 60 points 53 points 47 points 23 points 0 points Required criteria Title slide including group members Introductory slide with the clinical problem Additional slides illustrating key points Conclusion slide Reference slide in current APA format Effective balance of color, graphics, words, and space Slide limit: 10–12, inclusive of introduction and references ***Optional handouts may be included to provide information for the audience to keep. Includes 7 requirements for section. Includes 6 requirements for section. Includes 5 requirements for section. Includes 4 or less requirements for section. No requirements for this section presented. Peer Evaluation (15 points/6%) 15 points 13 points 11 points 6 points 0 points Completed peer evaluation with respectful and constructive feedback. Equal work: Did equal share of work. Teamwork: Took the initiative in helping get the group organized. Communication: Provided ideas for the development of the presentation. Team membership skills: Assisted group members. Time: Met all deadlines. Includes 6 requirements for section. Includes 5 requirements for section. Includes 4 requirements for section. Includes 3 or less requirements for section. No requirements for this section presented. Total Points Possible = 240 points © 2021 Chamberlain University. All Rights Reserved NR449_RUA_Group_Presentation_V2_JUL22 0
Please create a PowerPoint of maximum of 12 slides. Please review the question I created regarding my toping. The PowerPoint should be focused on “In patients with opioid-related hospital stays, how d
Topic: Overdose and the Impact on Health Care The question I developed is “In patients with opioid-related hospital stays, how does opioid-related spending compared to other hospital-stay visits, affects the hospital financially and interfere with patient’s outcome?” References Boté S. H. (2019). U.S. Opioid Epidemic: Impact on Public Health and Review of Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMPs). Online journal of public health informatics, 11(2), e18. https://doi.org/10.5210/ojphi.v11i2.10113 Mallow, P. J., Belk, K. W., Topmiller, M., & Strassels, S. A. (2018). Geographic variation in hospital costs, payments, and length of stay for opioid-related hospital visits in the USA. Journal of pain research, 11, 3079–3088. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S184724 Walters, S. M., Bolinski, R. S., Almirol, E., Grundy, S., Fletcher, S., Schneider, J., Friedman, S. R., Ouellet, L. J., Ompad, D. C., Jenkins, W., & Pho, M. T. (2022). Structural and community changes during COVID-19 and their effects on overdose precursors among rural people who use drugs: a mixed-methods analysis. Addiction science & clinical practice, 17(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13722-022-00303-8

Journal Article 1 Review the attached assignment for completing journal article #1. You MUST use Microsoft Word. Submit your completed assignment to Canvas. After ope

Journal Article 1

Review the attached assignment for completing journal article #1.  You MUST use Microsoft Word.  Submit your completed assignment to Canvas.

After opening the file listed below, click on the link to the article.  You can print the article by going to Format located at the top right and clicking on PDF.  If you choose another format, the graphs will be difficult to read.

EDU 665 JOURNAL ARTICLE #1 ASSIGNMENT

(25 POINTS)

Instructions:  Go to the following professional journal article:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2410201/

Peer Tutoring to Prevent Firearm Play:  Acquisition, Generalization, and Long-term Maintenance of Safety Skills, Candice M. Jostad, Raymond G. Miltenberger, Pamela Kelso, and Peter Knudson

Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Spring 2008, Vol 41, No. 1, pp 117-123.

Review the article thoroughly.  Write a 1-2 page summary of the article in APA style, including purpose, method, procedures, results, and personal critique.  At the beginning of your summary, list the CORRECT and complete article citation in APA style.  Format your summary this way after listing the citation:


Purpose

State purpose


Method

Describe method


Procedures

Describe procedures


Results

Report the results


Personal Critique

Blah, blah, blah

Answer the questions below separately from the summary.

Respond to the 10 questions below.  Place your completed project in dropbox.  (15 points for summary, 10 points for answers to questions below).

1.   List the 4 goals of this research study.

2.   What is “in situ” assessment?

3.   Interobserver agreement is discussed in the textbook on pgs 101-104.

(a) Describe the process as used in the current article.

(b) Describe how this agreement was calculated in the current article.

4. List the rating method used to score each participant’s responses when finding a gun in his/her natural environment.

5.  What was the independent variable and describe how it was conducted.

6.  The total time spent coaching each peer trainer to conduct BST sessions ranged from 90 minutes to 115 minutes, with a mean score of 102.5 minutes.  Explain why the number of minutes varied.

7.  Review Figure 1 in the current article.  Which child’s baseline score was consistently perfect?

8.  In Figure 1 which child’s score (after training) improved the greatest from his/her first assessment (after training) to the second assessment?

9.  Review Figure 2 in the current article.  Study the data collected for each of the six participants during the maintenance phase of the project.  It varies significantly.

(a) Briefly report how each participant performed during the maintenance phase.

(b) What variables do you think may account for these differences?

10.  In evaluating the performance of all participants in this study, do you think the 4 goals of the study were accomplished?  Why or why not?

Journal Article 1 Review the attached assignment for completing journal article #1. You MUST use Microsoft Word. Submit your completed assignment to Canvas. After ope
Review the attached assignment for completing journal article #1.  You MUST use Microsoft Word.  Submit your completed assignment to Canvas.                                After opening the file listed below, click on the link to the article.  You can print the article by going to Format located at the top right and clicking on PDF.  If you choose another format, the graphs will be difficult to read. EDU 665 JOURNAL ARTICLE #1 ASSIGNMENT (25 POINTS) Instructions: Go to the following professional journal article: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2410201/ Peer Tutoring to Prevent Firearm Play: Acquisition, Generalization, and Long-term Maintenance of Safety Skills, Candice M. Jostad, Raymond G. Miltenberger, Pamela Kelso, and Peter Knudson Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Spring 2008, Vol 41, No. 1, pp 117-123. Review the article thoroughly. Write a 1-2 page summary of the article in APA style, including purpose, method, procedures, results, and personal critique. At the beginning of your summary, list the CORRECT and complete article citation in APA style. Format your summary this way after listing the citation: Purpose State purpose Method Describe method Procedures Describe procedures Results Report the results Personal Critique Blah, blah, blah Answer the questions below separately from the summary. Respond to the 10 questions below. Place your completed project in dropbox. (15 points for summary, 10 points for answers to questions below). List the 4 goals of this research study. What is “in situ” assessment? Interobserver agreement is discussed in the textbook on pgs 101-104. (a) Describe the process as used in the current article. (b) Describe how this agreement was calculated in the current article. 4. List the rating method used to score each participant’s responses when finding a gun in his/her natural environment. 5. What was the independent variable and describe how it was conducted. 6. The total time spent coaching each peer trainer to conduct BST sessions ranged from 90 minutes to 115 minutes, with a mean score of 102.5 minutes. Explain why the number of minutes varied. 7. Review Figure 1 in the current article. Which child’s baseline score was consistently perfect? 8. In Figure 1 which child’s score (after training) improved the greatest from his/her first assessment (after training) to the second assessment? 9. Review Figure 2 in the current article. Study the data collected for each of the six participants during the maintenance phase of the project. It varies significantly. (a) Briefly report how each participant performed during the maintenance phase. (b) What variables do you think may account for these differences? 10. In evaluating the performance of all participants in this study, do you think the 4 goals of the study were accomplished? Why or why not?

Investigate various challenges of Manifest Destiny the United States has faced in maintaining the republic. Based upon your investigations, choose one of these challenges and create a research design

Investigate various challenges of Manifest Destiny and how this faced in the maintaining the republic. Based upon your investigations create a research design that includes a proposal, annotated bibliography, and an outline/abstract. Your research question should be centered on how your chosen challenge affected the relationship between the American people and their government.

  1. Proposal: Write a 200-300-word synopsis of your chosen research question based on the challenge that you chose.
  2. Informative Annotated Bibliography: Find a minimum of eight sources, half of which must be primary sources, that support your research question. Discuss how each source supports or contradicts your research question. Please see the GCU Student Success Center resource, Preparing Annotated Bibliographies for additional information.
  3. Research Summary: Write a 500-750-word summary based upon your research and revise your research question. Did the sources you find change your research question in any way?

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the Turabian Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

Is it possible to do this? Week One-Administrative, Jasco Overview, Fundamentals of Investing, How to Start a Hedge Fund Learning Objectives Orientation and TrainingCreate a bank account if necessary

Is it possible to do this?

Week One-Administrative, Jasco Overview, Fundamentals of Investing, How to Start a Hedge Fund

Learning Objectives

  • Orientation and Training
  • Create a bank account if necessary.
  • Overview of Basecamp
  • Overview of Google Sheets and Google Docs
  • How to start an LLC
  • Fundamentals of Investing

Resources Links

  • Google Sheets for Beginners
  • How to use Google Docs
  • 10 steps to start your business
  • Basecamp Basics
  • Banking Information
  • 2017 Jasco Annual Report
  • 2022 Jasco Philanthropies Inaugural Annual Report
  • How Hedge Funds are Structured
  • Jasco Business Solutions Capabilities Deck
  • Fundamentals of Investing

Suggested Reading

  • ForaGoodJobby30,DothisinYour20s
  • Why Didn’t They Teach Me This in School

Assignments

  • Write a 1-page summary on the Jasco Group and its key components
  • Write a 2 page summary of the fundamentals of investing material
  • Complete Weekly Curriculum Review
  • Review www.TheJascoGroup.co
  • Review JamesColeJr.me

What is the role of DNA in the process of protein synthesis?DNA contains the genetic instructions for protein synthesis. It serves as a template for the production of mRNA (messenger RNA) during trans

What is the role of DNA in the process of protein synthesis?DNA contains the genetic instructions for protein synthesis. It serves as a template for the production of mRNA (messenger RNA) during transcription. The mRNA then carries the genetic code from the nucleus to the ribosomes in the cytoplasm, where it is used as a template for the assembly of amino acids into a protein during translation. Thus, DNA plays a crucial role in determining the sequence of amino acids in a protein.

Please answer the following questions regarding policy modification: Question 1: Compare and contrast, policy initiation and policy modification. Question 2: Discuss the concept of incrementalism in

Please answer the following questions regarding policy modification:

Question 1: Compare and contrast, policy initiation and policy modification.

Question 2: Discuss the concept of incrementalism in public policymaking.

Response for each question should be submitted using the text box and be at least 100 words long and no more than 200 words long.

***************************************************************************************************************************

Assignment Instructions:

Please review the Weekly Assignment Grading Rubric prior to submission.

Make sure you read and understand the directions and requirements for each Assignment. Please ensure you cite your references in APA format with a minimum of 3 references (You may use your textbook as a reference and you should have a minimum of 2 academic outside references). Assignment will be graded based on the following areas: Foundation and synthesis of knowledge, application of knowledge critical thinking, writing skills, and organization of ideas and format. Refer to Library Online Resource Center for any research assistance. Refer to the Student Handbook for policies relevant to academic honesty and other procedures and policies related to this course. Assignments submitted late without advance notice will receive a 5% per daylate penalty and will not be accepted for grading five (5) days past the due date.

Course: Cross Cultural Management 1.Week 7 Final Research Paper You have learned this term that it is important to understand how the variable of societal culture fits into the theories of individ

Course: Cross Cultural Management

1.Week 7 Final Research Paper

You have learned this term that it is important to understand how the variable of societal culture fits into the theories of individual managerial traits, leader behavior, interaction patterns, role relationships, follower perceptions, influence over followers, influence on task and team goals, and influence managerial behavior (Cross Cultural Research on Leadership). Select three to four political leaders or business leaders of multinational companies based in other countries, for example, Switzerland, Russia, Venezuela, Turkey, or the Czech Republic. Research their leadership styles as they cope with both internal and international societal issues of importance to their companies or countries. Your paper should synthesize the theories and concepts learned this term and clearly demonstrate that you can apply them in your analysis. Cite your textbook as well as outside academic research from the KU online library. You may also use these Internet sources:

  • http://www.forbes.com/leaders/#687e2f0163a5
  • https://eca.state.gov/
  • https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/world-leaders-1/

In 10-12 pages, your APA research paper should reflect several weeks of effort and demonstrate your ability to analyze, apply, evaluate, and synthesize the managerial cross cultural theories and concepts learned this term.

KU online library:  https://keiseruniversity.libguides.com/home/home?preview=afb5d66ab3b853fa361847ea7dfda322

Textbook: Diversity Consciousness: Opening Our Minds to People, Cultures, and Opportunities. Bucher.

Print ISBN: 9780321919069, 0321919068

eText ISBN: 9780321937391, 0321937392

2.Week 7 Final Research Paper PresentationPlease create a powerpoint presentation of your Week 7 Final Paper. (I hope the tutor can prepare a speech while making PPT based on the thesis. Thank you very much!)

Reference requirements:

2020-2023 (Peer Review)

APA format

Respond to post 250 word min Part I: Briefly discuss the working thesis and model of your proposed research topic and your impetus for this topic. At this point in time, which is early in the process

Respond to post 250 word min

Part I: Briefly discuss the working thesis and model of your proposed research topic and your impetus for this topic.

At this point in time, which is early in the process of my dissertation, I feel the working thesis and model of my proposed research topic will be the filling-the-gap-model. According to (Greene & Lidinsky, 2021), “the gap model pointes to what other writers may have overlooked or ignored in discussing a given issue. The gap model typically makes a claim of value.” The topic of research I am currently planning is employee engagement in emergency services personnel through different leadership styles. Many styles of leadership are utilized in today’s emergency services field, however, many times the incorrect leadership style is utilized due to what managers have been taught or shown throughout their career. Today’s firefighters and paramedics are not the firefighters and paramedics of the 90’s. We have to research comparative analysis on managers’ self-awareness involving mental and physical attributes along with their emotional intelligence. We have to revise the way managers are assessed and promoted within emergency service agencies. My motivation is to assist future executives in assessing individuals for managerial positions for the right reasons and not what we think it right.

Part II: On June 11, 2020, Dr. Andrew Gelman, Professor of Statistics and Political Science and Director of the Applied Statistics Center at Columbia University, posted a blog on the peer-review process. Review his comments and those of others. Regarding academic research, discuss who is responsible for the quality of the research? Is it the authors or researchers or the peer reviewers of the academic journal or the academic journal?

My belief is the author has the overarching responsibility to ensure the quality of the research and the work of the team meet the expectations to address the problem statement. Now this does not allow the rest of the team to escape from their responsibilities as well. As academia personnel we all have the responsibility. The researchers have the responsibility to ensure their research is ethical, safe, and compliant to support the problem statement and to review all hypothesis involved. When it comes to peer reviewers it is important, they understand the field of study and the problem statement as a whole. It can become a problem if the peer reviewers have questionable backgrounds or understanding of the research subject. “Research indicates that peer reviewer recommendations have a direct influence on editorial decisions. This becomes a problem when the quality of peer reviewer is questionable or a peer reviewer become biased as a functionality” (Glonti, et al. 2019, p. 7).

Part III: Some people believe that poor writing in a peer-reviewed paper is a reflection on the writer. Others believe it is a reflection on the journal and its editors. What are your thoughts? Why?

I believe a poor article can reflect on all parties involved. However, the author should ensure before sending his article forward for peer review that they have had the article reviewed by other parties as well, to include the researchers. When coming across a poor peer reviewed article, I believe the author did not ensure they had their work reviewed by those who did not have direct interest in the work. Many times, we get so close to our work and passions, we miss the most important aspects or communication styles that many times are missing. We have to be aware of our blind spots and allow others to point out what we missed, so it can be corrected. I am sure there are instances where journal editors have changed the authors work all around and made changes to the work, in the spirit of transparency, any professional editor would consult with the author before doing so. We have all the responsibility and as a future author, I will ensure that my expectations are outlined during the work and before printing.

Though Provoking Question: Is anyone in our class planning on taking their work past manuscript publication towards an educational book for your field of service or within the business field?

Activity 1Professional Ethics Instructions Baccalaureate education includes the development of professional values and value-based behavior (AACN, 2008). Ethics define professional ethics and their im

Activity 1Professional Ethics Instructions

Baccalaureate education includes the development of professional values and value-based behavior (AACN, 2008). Ethics define professional ethics and their importance in the healthcare environment. The American Nurses Association has approved 13 standardized languages that support nursing care.  The benefits of standardized language include: better communication among nurses and other healthcare providers, increased visibility of nursing interventions, enhanced data collection to evaluate nursing care outcomes, and improved patient care. It is the responsibility of the nurse to know and understand standardized terminology.

In a 4-5 page reflection paper, assess your nursing career through “appreciative inquiry” (Billings & Kowalski, 2008).

  • Drawing on your own life stories and experiences, what does a nursing career meant to you?
  • How does your nursing practice parallel the ANA (2015) Code of Ethics?  List 4 specific examples from the Code of Ethics.
  • Why is consistent and standardized nursing language necessary for care in today’s healthcare environment and how does it relate to the Code of Ethics?
  • What motivates you to remain in the nursing profession?  Give an example through a personal story and what you learned that motivates you as a registered nurse.
  • Develop 3 short-term and 3 long-term goals that emphasize your unique strengths.
  • How will a BSN degree impact your short-term and long-term goals?
  • Be creative and talk about your personal journey as a nurse. Include a personal nursing philosophy in the reflection.

Readings & Resources

  • Chapter 7 – Ethics: Basic Concepts for Professional Nursing Practice in Black, B. P. (2019). Professional nursing: Concepts & challenges.
  • American Nurses Association (ANA) Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretive Statements
  • Winland-Brown, J., Lachman, V. D., & Swanson, E. O. (2015). The new “code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements” (2015): Practical clinical application, part I. MEDSURG Nursing, 24(4), 268–271.
  • Billings, D., & Kowalski, K. (2008). Appreciative inquiry. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 39(3), 104.
  • The ICN Code of Ethics for Nurses
  • Moore, C. (2019). What is appreciative inquiry? (definition, examples, & model).

Additional Instructions:

  1. All submissions should have a title page and reference page.
  2. Utilize a minimum of two scholarly resources.
  3. Adhere to grammar, spelling and punctuation criteria.
  4. Adhere to APA compliance guidelines.
  5. Adhere to the chosen Submission Option for Delivery of Activity guidelines.

Submission Options

Choose One:

Instructions:

Paper

  • 4 to 5-page paper. Include title and reference pages.

Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation

  • 6 to 10 slides with speaker notes. Add title and reference slides.
  • Follow Rules of 7.

Other media (Prezi, etc.) presentation

  • 6 to 10 slides. Add title and reference slides.
  • Follow Rules of 7.

Video Presentation

  • 7 to 8-minute video presentation.
  • Attach reference page or include in video.
  • Professional appearance and background.
  • Video submissions must include a script in Word format, submitted through Turnitin for an Originality Report.

Table

  • Table with appropriate columns and headers.
  • Include title and reference pages.

Graphs or other illustrations

  • Graphs or illustrations with appropriate labels. Include title and reference pages.

Poster

  • Poster utilizing any applicable poster template. Include visual graphics/images/other formats for visual appeal. Include appropriate title and references on poster.

Note: Title and reference pages/slides do not count towards the count requirements.