Assignment 4: Employment Law Case Brief, writing homework help

Are you pressed for time and haven’t started working on your assignment yet? Would you like to buy an assignment? Use our custom writing services for better grades. Even if your deadline is approaching fast, our writers can handle your task right when you need it.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper


Due Week 10 and worth 200 points

Using the Internet, select and research an employment law case no greater than five (5) years old.

Write a three to four (3-4) page brief in which you:

  1. Summarize the issue of the case, and then explain the employment law that was violated.
  2. Evaluate the type of impact the violation had on the organization
    then determine two (2) ways the organization could mitigate the issue.
    Justify your response.
  3. Based on your research, determine if a policy was or was not in
    place during the violation. Then, recommend a communication for all
    employees to enhance the knowledge of the policy. Support your response.
  4. As a HR Manager, explore an organization you worked for or familiar
    with, then suggest three (3) ways you could make the organization
    violation free from employment law issues. Justify your response.
  5. Use at least three (3) quality academic resources in this
    assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as
    academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with
    one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA
    or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional
    instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the
    student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date.
    The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required
    assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

  • Determine employment laws that apply to the selection, development, and management of employees.
  • Evaluate policies and processes that promote a diverse workforce.
  • Develop policies that are compliant with employment laws.
  • Use technology and information resources to research issues in employment law.
  • Write clearly and concisely about employment law using proper writing mechanic.

Grading
for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic /
organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the
following rubric.

Points: 200

Assignment 4: Employment Law Case Brief

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 70% F

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Summarize the issue of the case, and then explain the employment law that was violated.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely summarized the issue of the case, and then explain the employment law that was violated.

Partially summarized the issue of the case, and then explain the employment law that was violated.

Satisfactorily summarized the issue of the case, and then explain the employment law that was violated.

Thoroughly summarized the issue of the case, and then explain the employment law that was violated.

2.
Evaluate the type of impact the violation had on the organization then
determine two (2) ways the organization could mitigate the issue.
Justify your response.
Weight: 20%

Did
not submit or incompletely evaluated the type of impact the violation
had on the organization then did not submit or incompletely determined
two (2) ways the organization could mitigate the issue. Did not submit
or incompletely justified your response.

Partially
evaluated the type of impact the violation had on the organization then
partially determined two (2) ways the organization could mitigate the
issue. Partially justified your response.

Satisfactorily
evaluated the type of impact the violation had on the organization then
satisfactorily determined two (2) ways the organization could mitigate
the issue. Satisfactorily justified your response.

Thoroughly
evaluated the type of impact the violation had on the organization then
thoroughly determined two (2) ways the organization could mitigate the
issue. Thoroughly justified your response.

3.
Based on your research, determine if a policy was or was not in place
during the violation. Then, recommend a communication for all employees
to enhance the knowledge of the policy. Support your response.

Weight: 20%

Did
not submit or incompletely determined if a policy was or was not in
place during the violation, based on your research. Then, did not submit
or incompletely recommended a communication for all employees to
enhance the knowledge of the policy. Did not submit or incompletely
supported your response.

Partially
determined if a policy was or was not in place during the violation,
based on your research. Then, partially recommended a communication for
all employees to enhance the knowledge of the policy. Partially
supported your response.

Satisfactorily
determined if a policy was or was not in place during the violation,
based on your research. Then, satisfactorily recommended a communication
for all employees to enhance the knowledge of the policy.
Satisfactorily supported your response.

Thoroughly
determined if a policy was or was not in place during the violation,
based on your research. Then, thoroughly recommended a communication for
all employees to enhance the knowledge of the policy. Thoroughly
supported your response.

4.
As a HR Manager, explore an organization you worked for or familiar
with, then suggest three (3) ways you could make the organization
violation free from employment law issues. Justify your response.

Weight: 20%

Did
not submit or incompletely explored an organization you worked for or
familiar with as an HR manager, then did not submit or incompletely
suggested three (3) ways you could make the organization violation free
from employment law issues. Did not submit or incompletely justified
your response.

Partially
explored an organization you worked for or familiar with as an HR
manager, then partially suggested three (3) ways you could make the
organization violation free from employment law issues. Partially
justified your response.

Satisfactorily
explored an organization you worked for or familiar with as an HR
manager, then satisfactorily suggested three (3) ways you could make the
organization violation free from employment law issues. Satisfactorily
justified your response.

Thoroughly
explored an organization you worked for or familiar with as an HR
manager, then thoroughly suggested three (3) ways you could make the
organization violation free from employment law issues. Thoroughly
justified your response.

5. 3 references

Weight: 5%

No references provided.

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

6.Writing Mechanics, Grammar, and Formatting

Weight: 5%

Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

Error free or almost error free grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.

7.Appropriate use of APA in-text citations and  reference

Weight: 5%

Lack of in-text citations and / or lack of reference section.

In-text citations and references are provided, but they are only partially formatted correctly in APA style.

Most in-text citations and references are provided, and they are generally formatted correctly in APA style.

In-text citations and references are error free or almost error free and consistently formatted correctly in APA style.

8.Information Literacy / Integration of Sources

Weight: 5%

Serious errors in the integration of sources, such as intentional or accidental plagiarism, or failure to use in-text citations.

Sources are partially integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

Sources are mostly integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

Sources are consistently integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.

9.Clarity and Coherence of Writing

Weight: 5%

Information is confusing to the reader and fails to include reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Information is partially clear with minimal reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Information is mostly clear and generally supported with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Information is provided in a clear, coherent, and consistent manner with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.

Writerbay.net

Most students find it hard to finish papers at some point in their studies. If it ever happens to you, don’t get desperate—we have a service for every writing emergency! Whether you’re stuck with a problem, equation, or a piece of creative writing, we will definitely come to your rescue. Fill in the order form with the details of your paper. Write your personal instructions so we can meet your expectations.


Order a Similar Paper Order a Different Paper