As a PMHNP working with vulnerable patient populations, you must be able to assess whether these symptoms are caused by psychological, social, or underlying growth and development issues. You must the

As a PMHNP working with vulnerable patient populations, you must be able to assess whether these symptoms are caused by psychological, social, or underlying growth and development issues. You must the
NURS_6630_Week4_Assignment_Rubric NURS_6630_Week4_Assignment_Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelop a patient medication guide for treatment of depressive disorders in a vulnerable population you selected. • Depressive disorder causes and symptoms • How depression is diagnosed for the vulnerable population of your choice 20 to >17.0 pts Excellent Point range: 90–100 Discussion includes Depressive disorder causes and symptoms; Discussion includes how depression is diagnosed for the chosen vulnerable population. The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the specific patient factors that impact decision making when prescribing medication for this patient. 17 to >15.0 pts Good Point range: 80–89 Discussion is vague regarding Depressive disorder causes and symptoms; Discussion is vague on how depression is diagnosed for the chosen vulnerable population. 15 to >13.0 pts Fair Point range: 70–79 Discussion is vague regarding Depressive disorder and missing causes and/or symptoms; Discussion is vague on how depression is diagnosed for the chosen vulnerable population. 13 to >0 pts Poor Point range: 0–69 Discussion is inaccurate regarding Depressive disorder and missing causes and/or symptoms; Discussion is missing and/or inaccurate on how depression is diagnosed for the chosen vulnerable population. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Medication treatment options including risk vs benefits; side effects; FDA approvals for the vulnerable population of your choice • Medication considerations of medication examples prescribed • What is important to monitor in terms of labs, comorbid medical issues with why important for monitoring of medications prescribed 20 to >17.0 pts Excellent Point range: 90–100 Medication treatment options are discussed including risk vs benefits; side effects; FDA approvals for the chosen vulnerable population; Medication considerations of medication examples prescribed; contains discussion of items important to monitor in terms of labs, comorbid medical issues with why important for monitoring. 17 to >15.0 pts Good Point range: 80–89 Medication treatment options are briefly discussed and vague regarding risk vs benefits; side effects; FDA approvals for the chosen vulnerable population is vague; vague discussion medication considerations of medication examples prescribed; contains discussion of items important to monitor in terms of labs, comorbid medical issues with why important for monitoring. 15 to >13.0 pts Fair Point range: 70–79 Medication treatment options are vague and missing risk vs benefits; side effects; missing discussion of FDA approvals for the chosen vulnerable population; no medication considerations of medication examples prescribed; missing elements of discussing items important to monitor in terms of labs, comorbid medical issues with why important for monitoring. 13 to >0 pts Poor Point range: 0–69 Medication treatment options are inaccurate, vague and/or missing including risk vs benefits; side effects; missing or inaccurate discussion on FDA approvals for the chosen vulnerable population; no medication considerations of medication examples prescribed discussed; contains inaccurate, minimal, or no discussion of items important to monitor in terms of labs, comorbid medical issues with why important for monitoring. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• Special Considerations (you must be specific, not general and address at least one for EACH category; you must demonstrate critical thinking beyond basics of HIPPA and informed consent!): legal considerations, ethical considerations, cultural considerations, social determinants of health • Where to follow up in your local community for further information 20 to >17.0 pts Excellent Point range: 90–100 Special Considerations are discussed and specific, not general and address at least one for EACH category demonstrating critical thinking beyond basics of HIPPA and informed consent: legal considerations, ethical considerations, cultural considerations, social determinants of health. Discussion includes directions for where to follow up in local community for further information. 17 to >15.0 pts Good Point range: 80–89 Special Considerations are discussed not specific, but general and address at least one for EACH category demonstrating critical thinking beyond basics of HIPPA and informed consent: legal considerations, ethical considerations, cultural considerations, social determinants of health. Discussion includes directions for where to follow up in local community for further information. 15 to >13.0 pts Fair Point range: 70–79 Special Considerations are discussed not specific, but general and missing 1-2 of EACH category and does not demonstrate critical thinking beyond basics of HIPPA and informed consent: legal considerations, ethical considerations, cultural considerations, social determinants of health. Discussion directions for where to follow up in local community for further information are vague. 13 to >0 pts Poor Point range: 0–69 Special Considerations are discussed not specific, is inaccurate and/or general and missing 3+ or more or does not discuss any of EACH category, inaccurate discussion and/or does not demonstrate critical thinking beyond basics of HIPPA and informed consent: legal considerations, ethical considerations, cultural considerations, social determinants of health. Discussion does not include directions for where to follow up in local community for further information. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome• The medication guide discusses why the chosen population is considered vulnerable. The medications guide language is appropriate for the intended audience (patient, caregiver, parent, etc). The medication guide is interesting and appealing including use of graphics/tables. 15 to >13.0 pts Excellent Point range: 90–100 The medication guide discusses why the chosen population is considered vulnerable. The medications guide language is appropriate for the intended audience (patient, caregiver, parent, etc). The medication guide is interesting and appealing including use of graphics/tables. 13 to >11.0 pts Good Point range: 80–89 The medication guide is vague in discussion why the chosen population is considered vulnerable. The medications guide language is not consistently appropriate for the intended audience (patient, caregiver, parent, etc). The medication guide is interesting and appealing including use of graphics/tables. 11 to >9.0 pts Fair Point range: 70–79 The medication guide does not discuss why the chosen population is considered vulnerable. The medications guide language is not consistently appropriate for the intended audience (patient, caregiver, parent, etc). The medication guide has limited appeal with use of graphics/tables. 9 to >0 pts Poor Point range: 0–69 The medication guide does not discuss why the chosen population is considered vulnerable. The medications guide language is not appropriate for the intended audience (patient, caregiver, parent, etc). The medication guide is not interesting and appealing in and/or missing use of graphics/tables. 15 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProvides three examples of how to write a proper prescription that would be provided to patient and/or transmitted to pharmacy. Prescription contains date, medication and strength, amount to be taken, route to be taken, frequency, indication, quantity, refills; providers signature. 15 to >13.0 pts Excellent Point range: 90–100 Provides three examples of how to write a proper prescription that would be provided to patient and/or transmitted to pharmacy. Prescription contains date, medication and strength, amount to be taken, route to be taken, frequency, indication, quantity, refills; providers signature. 13 to >11.0 pts Good Point range: 80–89 Provides three examples of how to write a proper prescription that would be provided to patient and/or transmitted to pharmacy. Prescription is missing 1-2 elements of the following; date, medication and strength, amount to be taken, route to be taken, frequency, indication, quantity, refills; providers signature. 11 to >9.0 pts Fair Point range: 70–79 Provides two examples of how to write a proper prescription that would be provided to patient and/or transmitted to pharmacy. Prescription is missing 3 of the following: date, medication and strength, amount to be taken, route to be taken, frequency, indication, quantity, refills; providers signature. 9 to >0 pts Poor Point range: 0–69 Provides one example of how to write a proper prescription that would be provided to patient and/or transmitted to pharmacy. Prescription is missing 4+ or is inaccurately written for date, medication and strength, amount to be taken, route to be taken, frequency, indication, quantity, refills; providers signature. 15 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—Paragraph development and organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria. 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Point range: 90–100 Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. … A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. 4 to >3.5 pts Good Point range: 80–89 Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive. 3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair Point range: 70–79 Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. … Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. 3 to >0 pts Poor Point range: 0–69 Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time. … No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and punctuation; Includes title page and reference page with a minimum of 3 scholarly supporting resources outside of course provided resources. Paper is limited to 5 pages not including title and reference page. 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent Point range: 90–100 Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors; Includes title page and reference page with a minimum of 3 scholarly supporting resources outside of course provided resources; Paper is limited to 5 pages not including title and reference page. 4 to >3.5 pts Good Point range: 80–89 Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors; includes the following: title page and reference page. Only contains 2 scholarly supporting resources outside of course provided resources; Paper is 6 pages not including title and reference page. 3.5 to >3.0 pts Fair Point range: 70–79 Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors; missing one of the following; title page or reference page; only contains 1 scholaraly supporting resources outside of course provided; Paper is 7 pages not including title and reference page resources. 3 to >0 pts Poor Point range: 0–69 Contains many (≥ five) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding; missing the following; title page and reference page; contains no scholaraly supporting resources outside of course provided resources; Paper is 8+ pages not including title and reference page. 5 pts Total Points: 100 PreviousNext
As a PMHNP working with vulnerable patient populations, you must be able to assess whether these symptoms are caused by psychological, social, or underlying growth and development issues. You must the
Title of the Paper Goes Here Student Name Here Program Name or Degree Name, Walden University Course Number and Title (NURS 6630 Psychopharmacology) Instructor Name (Dr. Katherine Gryzenia) Month, Day, Year (enter the date submitted to instructor) Title of the Paper Goes Here This is your introductory section. In this section, it will be important to identify your vulnerable population of choice and explain why this population is considered vulnerable. You may also want to go ahead and discuss depression causes, symptoms, and diagnosis in this population. If you do not discuss this content here in the introduction, then you will need to include it in the body of your document below. Your introductory section must end with a thesis statement that describes the purpose of your paper . The basic APA format that is required for this document is as follows: font should be Times New Roman 12-point, font color should be black, spacing should be double-spaced, margins should be 1”, indentations at the beginning of each paragraph should be 1/2”, and page numbers should be in the top right-hand corner of the page. Each paragraph within your document should be at least 3 sentences in length. The information contained within this paper should be paraphrased . Directly quoting your sources does not demonstrate your ability to assimilate and synthesize information at a graduate level; therefore, you must avoid using direct quotations in your papers. You must back up your facts by referencing credible sources within the primary and secondary literature . Your references must be cited in parenthetical citations within your text that correspond to a full entry in your reference list. In-text citations can either be placed at the end of a sentence or within a sentence as shown here, respectively: Employers cause burnout when employees are stressed by too much work (Leplante, 2019). According to Leplante (2019), employers cause burnout when employees are stressed by too much work . Level 1 Heading This text represents the beginning of the body of your paper. In the body of your paper, you should address all of the required content that was not discussed in the introduction above. You have the freedom to address this content in any way you choose. Please label the content sections with a level 1 heading. The content should be in your own words ; keep it interesting and appealing for your patient population by creating visual aids to address the required content rather than long, wordy paragraphs. Visual aids can be tables, graphs, diagrams, etc. Points will NOT be awarded for the use of images taken directly from the internet. Points will NOT be awarded for the use of visual aids that do not address required content . Another Level 1 Heading You should create additional content sections as needed until all of the required content has been addressed. The required content can be found in the instructions in Canvas and in the grading rubric; points will be deducted if required content is left out. As you write and create your visual aids, remember to stay within the five-page limit. The title page and reference page do not count towards your five-page limit; therefore, your total document will be seven pages. If you have more than one reference page, then your document may be greater than seven pages. Please submit your documents as Word files or PDF documents and verify that the correct document was submitted properly as resubmissions are not allowed. Example of a Visual Aid (Table) This visual was made/inserted directly into this Word document. To avoid formatting issues, this Word document was converted to a PDF. Conclusion The conclusion section should summarize the important points within your patient medication guide . You should not introduce new ideas in this paragraph; the conclusion should summarize what you have already written and perhaps what it means in the bigger picture . References Journal Article; Two Authors; DOI Leplante, J. P. & Nolin, C. (2014). Consultas and socially responsible investing in Guatemala: A case study examining Maya perspectives on the Indigenous right to free, prior, and informed consent. Society & Natural Resources, 27(4), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2013.861554   Journal Article, Two Authors; URL Eaton, T. V., & Akers, M. D. (20007). Whistleblowing and good governance. CPA Journal, 77(6), 66–71. http://archives.cpajournal.com/2007/607/essentials/p58.htm Journal Article, More Than Twenty Authors; DOI Wiskunde, B., Arslan, M., Fischer, P., Nowak, L., Van den Berg, O., Coetzee, L., Juárez, U., Riyaziyyat, E., Wang, C., Zhang, I., Li, P., Yang, R., Kumar, B., Xu, A., Martinez, R., McIntosh, V., Ibáñez, L. M., Mäkinen, G., Virtanen, E., . . . Kovács, A. (2019). Indie pop rocks mathematics: Twenty One Pilots, Nicolas Bourbaki, and the empty set. Journal of Improbable Mathematics, 27(1), 1935–1968. https://doi.org/xxx/xxxxxx Book; One Author Weinstein, J. A. (2019). Social change (3rd ed.). Rowman & Littlefield. Book; Chapter in an Edited Book Christensen, L. (2020). For my people: Celebrating community through poetry. In B. Bigelow, B. Harvey, S. Karp, & L. Miller (Eds.), Rethinking our classrooms: Teaching for equity and justice (Vol. 2; pp. 16–17). Rethinking Schools. Professional Organization Web page Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2018). Back to school. https://www.cdc.gov/features/teens-back-to-school/index.html Professional Organization Book American Nurses Association. (2010). Nursing: Scope and standards of practice (2nd ed.). Two or more works by same author in the same year Wall, S. (2018a). Effects of friendship on children’s behavior. Journal of Social Psychology, 4(1), 101–105. Wall, S. (2018b). Trials of parenting adolescents with deviant behaviors. Journal of Child Psychology, 4(12), 161–167. Government Article National Institute of Mental Health. (1990). Clinical training in serious mental illness (DHHS Publication No. ADM 90-1679). U.S. Government Printing Office. Lecture Notes Health effects of exposure to forest fires [Lecture notes]. (2019). Walden University Blackboard. https://class.waldenu.edu Personal Communication (Only Goes in Body of Paper and not in References) Video Walden University. (2009). Title of video here [Video]. Walden University Blackboard. https://class.waldenu.edu Television (Audio) Important, I. M. (Producer). (1990, November 1). The nightly news hour [TV series episode]. Central Broadcasting Service. APA Resources You have other several options to assist you in the formulation of your reference page. Your American Psychological Association (APA) Manual is your best reference resource. Use the current edition with a copyright date of 2020. The Walden Writing Center also a great place for referencing advice at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/references. Citation and reference examples are provided in the ‘BSN TOP Ten References and Citations” handout found in the Writing Resources tab of the course. This document covers the 10 most commonly used reference and citation formats. You are responsible for looking up any that are not included on this list.